Choosing this poem was an appropriately synchronistic experience. I knew that I wanted to try some response/analysis writing, but hadn’t made a decision about what poet or piece to leap into first. Edna St. Vincent Millay’s “Time does not bring relief; you all have lied” crossed my path during, of all things, a rare scroll on Facebook (forgive me, TikTok, for I have sinned). I don’t think I even follow the account that posted it, but the algorithm actually got it right. Discovering this poem was one of those moments defined by that electric certainty signaling You’re on the right path. I’d been looking for a starting point, but it found me.
Everything I say past this point will likely make much more sense after a reading of the referenced poem. You can do that here.
Also, it’s worth noting that I knew little about Edna St. Vincent Millay before diving into this poem. I had read work of hers here and there, but didn’t know anything much about the author. I wanted to write my response to the poem at face value, without additional research into her life, just to see what the words meant to me without additional context.
After I felt satisfied with the writing, I did a little digging into the biography of the famous author. I highly recommend a perusal of her history—she was a Pulitzer-winning poet, an imperfect and fierce feminist, the eldest daughter of a single mother, a pacifist-turned-anti-fascist, a bisexual and polyamorous wife and lover, and an inspiration to multitudes of other poets, including Mary Oliver.
~
“Time does not bring relief; you all have lied” is not the kind of poem that searches for an answer, but simply names the heartsore, disruptive experience of grief. The Italian-form sonnet illustrates how typical platitudes about time and healing are useless at best, and re-traumatizing at worst, when met with the piercing inescapability of memory. In just fourteen, sharp lines, Millay walks us through the seemingly-eternal tunnel of grief’s permission-less co-habitation and devastating permanence.
This poem’s most defining character is not a presence, but an absence. The repeated third-person personal pronouns and the phrase “last year’s bitter loving” seems to point to the speaker mourning a lover. The missingness, the memories, and the places the voice presents to the reader indicate a romantic partner or close family member; but the universality of the theme of loss means we can read it, too, as grief for a child, a dear friend, a beloved pet, or even an identity.
Oddly, I can also read it, through the lens of my personal background, as the idea of losing a god. I remember the grief that burst out of me one day last year when a friend referenced the allegorical tale Hind’s Feet On High Places. The disappointed protagonist in the story is led through intense trials by a shepherd figure, then eventually lifted to a more generous, satisfying place than she’d ever imagined. The beauty of the optimism was not lost on me, but I no longer carried the key to unlock the hope. In tears, I replied, “But there’s no shepherd, anymore.”
A million and one paper-cuts of abusive environments, broadening education, soul analysis, and personal experiences have destroyed the sense of a protective Presence, a powerful Other that might have answers, and, more importantly, might just care about the questions. This evaporated faith is firstly a freedom and empowerment not worth surrendering to an altar of comfort. Dependence on a savior, be they spiritual, political, or relational, is a consistent liability. I will choose community, cosmic mystery, and connection with my own soul over an all-in-one “rescue” every time. But a relinquished belief is also a grief, as permanent as the life-altering loss recorded for us in Millay’s poem.
~
If we fling ourselves beyond the barrier of gendered or social-relational assumptions while reading the text, we can also appreciate the lines as someone mourning the loss of themselves. As if the voice is living in the wake of a vanished identity and still remembers how it felt to be that carefree person, specifically in the gentler times.
It’s rare, at least in my conversational circles, to wish for an old life; many of us are forced from former ways of living out of the sheer need to survive. Additionally, we have made knowing, expanding, and trusting ourselves the business of our being. Returning to who we once were is just not usually appealing.
But when the polished face of “healing” is rubbed raw, and you feel just the same as you always have, as if nothing has changed, and you are looping back again and again to familiar sensations of defeat…when you recall the occasional, genuine happiness of naïveté…well, anyone can understand missing the version of the person who lived that life. Even if you’d never choose to live from that identity again.
This complicated nostalgia skips the point, perhaps, of existing as a human. We are not alive, it seems, to exist in a state of constancy; and the past, more often than not, keeps us captive. Every single reflection back to us from the natural world is never a journey of going rearward, but onward. Not “forward,” in the linear, corporate, capitalistic sense of “progress profit”; but onward. Inward, downward, outward. Like root systems. Like rivers. Like seasons. We are meant to spin through cycles and spiral through similar territories, yes—but not to go back to what we first were. We can’t, even if we sometimes, not surprisingly, want to.
~
The exclamation points in this poem highlight the frustration and anger of the voice at the lies told, the lies of a promise that “time would ease me of my pain!” The speaker recounts the turning of seasons, rain and tide, snow and leaf smoke, passing without comfort. We feel the rightness of the anger in the face of the discovered fiction, the proverbial relief likely having been offered as much for the solace of its giver as its recipient. Time is shifting and reshaping the world around the voice, but not the thoughts, memories, or bitterness within the human. And this reality, outside the deep loss itself, is its own cruel disappointment.
As with every piece of poetry, there are many different ways to interpret its meaning and intent. The phrases “Last year’s bitter loving must remain / heaped on my heart” caught my attention. I wonder, is the memory bitter only because of what the speaker has lost? Or was the love itself, though infused with importance and affection and familiarity, never quite right, never quite a fit? Is the speaker stating that even the experience of the loving was bitter? The possibility simply breeds more questions: Was the loss predicted? Were the parties in conflict? Was the ending through death or abandonment? Was the final year of the relationship plagued by other losses, health issues, or insecurities, thus wrapping the endmost memories in a shroud of unhappiness? Again, the poem is not here to offer answers. It is simply a witness.
The voice states “There are a hundred places where I fear / To go,—so with his memory they brim.” It’s a haunting, mobile captivity, this recognition the speaker carries…that the memories, and therefore the truth of absence, will be stung awake by visiting somewhere connected to the one they’ve lost. What’s more, there are so many of these places, and they “brim” with recollections that bring sorrow. There is a sensation of being paralyzed and no longer able to live normally…because this is exactly the point. Life has irrevocably changed, and the speaker struggles to make peace with this.
“I miss him,” “I want him,” “bitter loving must remain,” “my old thoughts abide.” There is a mixed want and weariness, a sort of desperate, panting reach in the tone of the words. The speaker is both dogged by the memories, and still hungering for the lost reality they represent. The intensity builds like waves, cresting then falling. And finally, when we can feel a breath of bright reprieve alongside the voice—“entering with relief some quiet place / Where never fell his foot or shone his face”—the hope collapses. In the same instant of realizing “There is no memory of him here!”, we too are “stricken” with the speaker as we realize all escape is an illusion. Relief is impossible to locate, because the voice, not the place, is the entity carrying the loss. The very act of recalling that there is nothing geographically to tie the speaker to their beloved is the same act of once again remembering them…and with this dawning, the darkness, again, descends.
~
There is a deep need in our western, speed-obsessed culture, to let grief take its course. Grief unnamed and unhonored will twist the best soul into a deformed shadow of itself. To rush anyone through their process of pain—or even to indicate that there is some kind of end point—is cruel, and, whether intentional or not, irresponsible.
And so, it seems somewhat deaf on my part to attempt to push beyond the container of the poem. Is it fair to insist to someone that eventually their grief will shift away from being the centerpoint of life into the shape of another glowing orb—or black hole—within their constellation of soul-marking events? Learning to co-exist with grief is not something accessed vicariously. It is a practice that must be woven by the strands of one’s own awareness, capacity, temperament, and ways of meaning-making. And we access this skill by going through the grief, not by bypassing, ignoring, or crushing it down.
One of the primary, and most effective, powers of poetry is witnessing. Seeing ourselves reflected back from the page can be both a tender and a liberating event. “Time does not bring relief; you all have lied” is a truthful, keening witness to the experience of loss. Edna St. Vincent Millay splits grief open like a ripened fruit, swording straight to its core, and she gives us a beautiful gift: the sense of being less alone. She creates solace within the sorrow by expressing and illustrating the most isolating of universal feelings.
In that private, hidden place of echoes within us, where we secret every sore-edged scar, there lies a hunger to be heard in our pain. To be met. To be understood. This poem is less medicine than mirror, more seen-ness than soothing. And yet, maybe everything we need is still present: the knowing that there are others who have felt what we feel and have found the words to communicate it, to translate what the body lives within loss into language. Sometimes, that is enough.
~
Thank you so much for reading. Truly.
I would love to hear your reflections, thoughts, opinions, questions, viewpoints etc. in response to this post. Please leave a comment below, shoot me an email, or send me a message here. I always reply.
If you’d like to receive notifications when new essays are published to this website, please subscribe below. (If it’s any consolation, I regularly go months without emailing this list. I couldn’t qualify as spam even if it was the goal.)